reviewer

Status: shipped-beta · Ships to: env+ tier arm (GETFF_SKILLS_ENV, setup.d/lib.sh:62) · Fires at: Claude Code skill auto-activation on review-ask triggers («проверь», «ревью», «вердикт», "is this correct?", "verify deliverable", …)

What it is

The interactive review-session skill: "You are the orchestrator's interactive QA partner: they build → you verify → they move on" (.claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:21). Its description scopes the deliverable as "a GO/REVISE/STOP verdict or a verified answer, not code", and excludes implementing fixes, writing tests, and the cold PR-boundary protocols (.claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:3). The header pins what it layers over: reviewer-discipline role rules and the severity contract are owned by .claude/rules/reviewer-discipline.md (§6 operating SSOT) — "which this skill layers over, never re-describes" (.claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:9 header).

How it works

Evidence discipline is explicit: "claims are verified through tools (file:line quotes, real command runs), never from memory or the orchestrator's narrative" (.claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:22-23 area). The ## Modes section (.claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:25) defines at least Question mode — answer YES / NO / PARTIALLY + one-line why + file:line evidence — and Deliverable-verification mode ("run the acceptance commands", line 217 area of the modes list). A ## Verdict shape (severity contract binding) section (.claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:42) binds output to the severity contract, followed by ## Economy default (line 34) and ## Hard bounds (line 66). Harness posture: portable — "prose review protocol over file reads + git" (.claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:6).

Satellites & companions

• USES: .claude/rules/reviewer-discipline.md (role separation + severity contract) — layered over, not re-described (SKILL.md:9 header).
• ADAPTS: the reviewer role for interactive sessions, as distinct from the dispatched cold auditors.
• ADDS: the session choreography — modes, economy defaults, verdict output shape — plus the trigger vocabulary that makes an interactive review reachable by phrase.
• Census family satellites: C19 (shipped-agent-liveness-prober — the probe class that exercises shipped agents) and, via the NOT-authoritative header, the cold auditors agents/fidelity-auditor.md (census C8) and agents/review-sidecar.md (census C10).

Anchors

• .claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:2 — name: reviewer
• .claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:3 — description: Use when the operator or an orchestrator asks for an interactive review with a verdict — «проверь», … — and the deliverable is a GO/REVISE/STOP verdict or a verified answer, not code. …
• .claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:6 — <!-- @harness-posture: portable — prose review protocol over file reads + git; … -->
• .claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:21 — You are the orchestrator's interactive QA partner: they build → you verify → they move on.
• .claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:25 — ## Modes
• .claude/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md:42 — ## Verdict shape (severity contract binding)
• setup.d/lib.sh:62 — GETFF_SKILLS_ENV="arch night-mode orchestrator pipeline reviewer"

All anchors at framework pin b069c59328aa8e08671d3a19fd25efa618dfc1c5 (2026-09-11).